## Corporate finance, tax depreciation, practice exam problems

 Author Message NEAS Supreme Being         Group: Administrators Posts: 4.2K, Visits: 1.2K Corporate finance, tax depreciation, practice exam problems*Question 1.1: Tax DepreciationAn asset with a depreciation basis of \$700,000 and no salvage value is depreciated by the following schedule for tax purposes.             Year         Percent                1                30%                2                25%                3                20%                4                15%                5                10%The marginal tax rate is 35% and the pre-tax borrowing rate is 12%. All cash flows occur at the end of the year. What is the total after-tax present value at time 0 of the tax shields? A.    \$200,000B.    \$204,000C.    \$208,000D.    \$212,000E.    \$216,000Answer 1.1: BThe rate to compute the after-tax present value of the depreciation tax shields is the after-tax borrowing rate. Year    Percent    Depreciation    Tax Shield    Present Value1    30%    \$210,000    \$73,500    \$68,1822    25%    \$175,000    \$61,250    \$52,7073    20%    \$140,000    \$49,000    \$39,1154    15%    \$105,000    \$36,750    \$27,2135    10%    \$70,000    \$24,500    \$16,830Total    100%    \$700,000    \$245,000    \$204,046The depreciation is the percentage given in the problem times the \$700,000 basis. The tax shield is 35% times the depreciation. The after-tax borrowing rate is 12% × (1 – 35%) = 7.80%. The present value of the tax shield is the tax shield divided by 1.0780 raised to the power of the years.The total present value of the five years’ depreciation is \$204,046.Question: What do we mean by the present value of the tax shields? And why do we use the after-tax rate?Answer: The after-tax present value of the tax shields is the amount of cash receive now that has the same value as the tax shields received each year.Suppose one firm receives \$204,046 now, and a second firm receives the tax shields each year in the future. To decide which firm has the better deal, we ask: if the first firm had to pay the cash of the tax shields, would it have positive or negative dollars left after 5 years?We suppose first that the 12% borrowing rate is also the investment yield. The first firm invests the \$204,046 at 12%.~    The investment increases to \$204,046 × 1.12 = \$228,532 after one year. The firm pays taxes of \$204,046 × 12% × 35% = \$8,570, so it has \$228,532 – \$8,570 = \$219,962. It pays the \$73,500 tax shield, leaving it with \$146,462.~    The investment increases to \$146,462 × 1.12 = \$164,037 after a second year. The firm pays taxes of \$146,462 × 12% × 35% = \$6,151, so it has \$164,037 – \$6,151 = \$157,886. It pays the \$61,250 tax shield, leaving it with \$96,636.At the end of five years, the firm’s investment just pays off the last tax shield.*Question 1.2: Tax DepreciationA project requires an initial investment of \$10 million. The project lasts 10 years and has a salvage value of zero at the end of 10 years.By law, the entire investment should be written off in year 0, when the investment is made. The tax rate is 35%. For a fee of N × \$10,000, a tax accountant can arrange for the investment to be depreciated over N years (pro-rata). What is the optimal fee paid to the tax accountant?A.    \$0 (write off the investment when it is made)B.    \$10,000 (depreciate the investment over 1 year)C.    \$30,000 (depreciate the investment over 3 years)D.    \$50,000 (depreciate the investment over 5 years)E.    \$100,000 (depreciate the investment over 10 years)Answer 1.2: AWriting off the investment immediately maximizes after-tax income. Tax depreciation lowers after-tax income in this scenario. Attachments CorpFinance.final.exam.pps.depr.master.pdf (216 views, 32.00 KB) Edited 2 Years Ago by NEAS NEAS Supreme Being         Group: Administrators Posts: 4.2K, Visits: 1.2K +x NEAS - 7/6/2006 1:45:47 PMCorporate finance, tax depreciation, practice exam problems*Question 1.1: Tax DepreciationAn asset with a depreciation basis of \$700,000 and no salvage value is depreciated by the following schedule for tax purposes.             Year         Percent                1                30%                2                25%                3                20%                4                15%                5                10%The marginal tax rate is 35% and the pre-tax borrowing rate is 12%. All cash flows occur at the end of the year. What is the total after-tax present value at time 0 of the tax shields? A.    \$200,000B.    \$204,000C.    \$208,000D.    \$212,000E.    \$216,000Answer 1.1: BThe rate to compute the after-tax present value of the depreciation tax shields is the after-tax borrowing rate. Year    Percent    Depreciation    Tax Shield    Present Value1    30%    \$210,000    \$73,500    \$68,1822    25%    \$175,000    \$61,250    \$52,7073    20%    \$140,000    \$49,000    \$39,1154    15%    \$105,000    \$36,750    \$27,2135    10%    \$70,000    \$24,500    \$16,830Total    100%    \$700,000    \$245,000    \$204,046The depreciation is the percentage given in the problem times the \$700,000 basis. The tax shield is 35% times the depreciation. The after-tax borrowing rate is 12% × (1 – 35%) = 7.80%. The present value of the tax shield is the tax shield divided by 1.0780 raised to the power of the years.The total present value of the five years’ depreciation is \$204,046.Question: What do we mean by the present value of the tax shields? And why do we use the after-tax rate?Answer: The after-tax present value of the tax shields is the amount of cash receive now that has the same value as the tax shields received each year.Suppose one firm receives \$204,046 now, and a second firm receives the tax shields each year in the future. To decide which firm has the better deal, we ask: if the first firm had to pay the cash of the tax shields, would it have positive or negative dollars left after 5 years?We suppose first that the 12% borrowing rate is also the investment yield. The first firm invests the \$204,046 at 12%.~    The investment increases to \$204,046 × 1.12 = \$228,532 after one year. The firm pays taxes of \$204,046 × 12% × 35% = \$8,570, so it has \$228,532 – \$8,570 = \$219,962. It pays the \$73,500 tax shield, leaving it with \$146,462.~    The investment increases to \$146,462 × 1.12 = \$164,037 after a second year. The firm pays taxes of \$146,462 × 12% × 35% = \$6,151, so it has \$164,037 – \$6,151 = \$157,886. It pays the \$61,250 tax shield, leaving it with \$96,636.At the end of five years, the firm’s investment just pays off the last tax shield.*Question 1.2: Tax DepreciationA project requires an initial investment of \$10 million. The project lasts 10 years and has a salvage value of zero at the end of 10 years.By law, the entire investment should be written off in year 0, when the investment is made. The tax rate is 35%. For a fee of N × \$10,000, a tax accountant can arrange for the investment to be depreciated over N years (pro-rata). What is the optimal fee paid to the tax accountant?A.    \$0 (write off the investment when it is made)B.    \$10,000 (depreciate the investment over 1 year)C.    \$30,000 (depreciate the investment over 3 years)D.    \$50,000 (depreciate the investment over 5 years)E.    \$100,000 (depreciate the investment over 10 years)Answer 1.2: AWriting off the investment immediately maximizes after-tax income. Tax depreciation lowers after-tax income in this scenario.
##### Merge Selected
Merge into selected topic...

Merge into merge target...

Merge into a specific topic ID...