Fox Module 4 Bivariate displays practice problems on ozone co-plots


Fox Module 4 Bivariate displays practice problems on ozone co-plots

Author
Message
NEAS
Supreme Being
Supreme Being (5.7K reputation)Supreme Being (5.7K reputation)Supreme Being (5.7K reputation)Supreme Being (5.7K reputation)Supreme Being (5.7K reputation)Supreme Being (5.7K reputation)Supreme Being (5.7K reputation)Supreme Being (5.7K reputation)Supreme Being (5.7K reputation)

Group: Administrators
Posts: 4.2K, Visits: 1.2K

Fox Module 4 Bivariate displays practice problems on ozone co-plots

 

(The attached PDF file has better formatting.)

 

 

Co-plots for ozone

 

The data relate to ozone levels in the atmosphere. The variables in the data sample are

 


        rad: solar radiation

        temp: daily temperature

        wind: wind speed

        ozone: ozone level in atmosphere


 

 

The ranges of the four variables are

 


 

        Daily temperature ranges from 57 to 97 degrees.

        Wind speed ranges from 2.3 to 20.7 miles per hour.

        Solar radiation ranges from 7 to about 334 units.

        Ozone levels range from 1 to 168 units (particles in a given volume of air).


 

 

The panels below are ordered from lower-left to upper-right by the values of the conditioning variable in the upper panel (temp) from left to right. The lower-left plot is for the lowest temperatures (56-72 degrees) and the upper right plot is for the highest temperatures (82-96 degrees). Solar radiation is not used in these plots.

 

The temperatures overlap. Each panel shares 50% of its points with the next higher panel and 50/% of its points with the next lower panel. For example, the first panel is 57̊-73̊and the second panel is 66̊-77̊. The overlap avoids distortions from random fluctuations near the end of a panel. For example, suppose the panels were for temperatures of 57̊-65̊ vs 66̊-77̊ and ozone levels were unusually high on a day with 65̊ temperature. The graph might show a spike in the first panel but not in the second panel.

 

Jacob: How can we tell the overlap percentage from the plot?

 

Rachel: One can not see the percentage from the plot, since one needs to know the distribution of points in each temperature group. The 50% is the R default, which Fox uses for his plots. One can change the default to another overlap percentage (if desired). The final exam problems do not ask anything not clear in the plot.

 

 

 


 


 

** Exercise 4.1: Variables

 


 

A.    What is the explanatory variable in these plots?

B.    What is the response variable in these plots?

C.    What is the conditioning variable in these plots?

 

Part A: The explanatory variable is wind speed.

 

Part B: The response variable is ozone level.

 

Part C: The conditioning variable is temperature.

 

 


 

** Exercise 4.2: Correlations

 


 

A.    At what temperatures is higher wind speed positively correlated with ozone levels?

B.    At what temperatures is higher wind speed negatively correlated with ozone levels?

 

Part A: At no temperatures are ozone levels positively correlated with wind speed. The second plot in the lower row shows a slight uptick at the highest wind speed caused by a single outlier. It is a random fluctuation, not the expected correlation of ozone levels and wind speed.

 

Part B: At temperatures of about 85̊ or higher, ozone levels are negatively correlated with wind speed. At temperatures of about 70̊ to 90̊, the negative correlation is strong at low wind speeds and weaker at high wind speeds.

 


Attachments
Nezzie
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie (6 reputation)Forum Newbie (6 reputation)Forum Newbie (6 reputation)Forum Newbie (6 reputation)Forum Newbie (6 reputation)Forum Newbie (6 reputation)Forum Newbie (6 reputation)Forum Newbie (6 reputation)Forum Newbie (6 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5, Visits: 1
On 4.2b, I am confused as to why the answer states that there is a positive correlation at temperatures 85 and higher.  Wouldn't this be the top most right graph, which seems to me to be negatively correlated...
LIAPP
Forum Member
Forum Member (32 reputation)Forum Member (32 reputation)Forum Member (32 reputation)Forum Member (32 reputation)Forum Member (32 reputation)Forum Member (32 reputation)Forum Member (32 reputation)Forum Member (32 reputation)Forum Member (32 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10, Visits: 7

I think they meant to say "negatively". The first sentence in the response to Part A and the first sentence in the response to part B contradict eachother.

[NEAS: Thank you; typo corrected.]


GO
Merge Selected
Merge into selected topic...



Merge into merge target...



Merge into a specific topic ID...





Reading This Topic


Login
Existing Account
Email Address:


Password:


Social Logins

  • Login with twitter
  • Login with twitter
Select a Forum....











































































































































































































































Neas-Seminars

Search